* [gentoo-dev] RE: stackguard, formatguard, etc.
@ 2002-02-19 9:40 Ali-Reza Anghaie
2002-02-21 18:20 ` Andreas Kinzl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ali-Reza Anghaie @ 2002-02-19 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: steveb
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1273 bytes --]
Well, WireX hasn't yet released a modern Stackguard compiler. Don't know
how long it will be but I'm sure it's in the works. Cryptomark II is
still in development, I don't know where CM I stands even. Subdomain is
a pain to use. Formatguard is just fine..
I'd be interested to see a few things along that line as separate
ebuilds. Installing a Stackguard GCC3 along-side the current GCC would
be nice. Don't want to replace the default GCC.. just use the Stackguard
compiler on those things internet-facing. { And particular package
maintainers may choose to have Stackguard as a dependency. }
It occurred to me that using RH compilers might not be a bad idea (not
directly related to the above). I guess we'll have to wait-and-see what
this GCC 3.1 in Rawhide becomes.
I haven't looked at the GCC ebuilds to see what all patches are done but
RH at least keeps that aspect pretty clean. There is the whole binary
incompatibility issue which burns ppl but it's just a thought.
Anyhow... perhaps when WireX releases a GCC 3.x Stackguard we can
re-visit the issue?
-Ali
--
OpenPGP key 53F7FF5F
--
Well, you know boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like a woman. You
just have to read the manual and press the right button.
-- Homer Simpson
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] RE: stackguard, formatguard, etc.
2002-02-19 9:40 [gentoo-dev] RE: stackguard, formatguard, etc Ali-Reza Anghaie
@ 2002-02-21 18:20 ` Andreas Kinzl
2002-02-22 4:49 ` Ali-Reza Anghaie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Kinzl @ 2002-02-21 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
where can i get this patches ??? (only the patches if it's possible)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ali-Reza Anghaie" <ali@packetknife.com>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Cc: <steveb@nebcoinc.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:40 AM
Subject: [gentoo-dev] RE: stackguard, formatguard, etc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] RE: stackguard, formatguard, etc.
2002-02-21 18:20 ` Andreas Kinzl
@ 2002-02-22 4:49 ` Ali-Reza Anghaie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ali-Reza Anghaie @ 2002-02-22 4:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 676 bytes --]
On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 13:20, Andreas Kinzl wrote:
> where can i get this patches ??? (only the patches if it's possible)
Perhaps you will find something under immunix.org. I know SRPMs can be
found here:
http://download.immunix.org/ImmunixOS/7.0/i386/SRPMS/
This is for EGCS 1.1.2..
I've got to believe WireX is working on a GCC 3.x version of this but
we'll see...
Oddly enough, I just realized Immunix isn't OSS.. it's own page talks
about the Immunix Commercial License for certain pieces. Whacky..
Anyhow.. -Ali
--
OpenPGP key 53F7FF5F
--
I don't know the key to success but the key to failure is trying to
please everybody. -- Bill Cosby
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-22 4:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-19 9:40 [gentoo-dev] RE: stackguard, formatguard, etc Ali-Reza Anghaie
2002-02-21 18:20 ` Andreas Kinzl
2002-02-22 4:49 ` Ali-Reza Anghaie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox