From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32756 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Dec 2002 15:52:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 1076 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2002 15:52:18 -0000 Message-ID: <001e01c2ae88$f1f31460$0101a8c0@cascade> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: References: <20021227150259.24a4a84a.bain@tcsn.co.za> <200212271615.28206.ben@thatproject.co.uk> <20021227123128.2bae542b.mcummings@datanode.net> <20021227195727.5da1f4fe.bain@tcsn.co.za> <20021227153542.6542bd9c.mcummings@datanode.net> <20021227225656.2249c015.greg@algx.net> <20021228050411.GD32519@gnosis.datanode.net> <002c01c2ae36$45046c60$0101a8c0@cascade> Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:51:08 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: [gentoo-dev] Duplicates - List Problem [Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..] X-Archives-Salt: 81b2f294-f0bc-47ca-8791-863319d12859 X-Archives-Hash: a185099628256ecda11d61313a1018f9 What's going on with the duplicates on this list? The below message has arrived twice, one almost 10 hours after the first. Tom Veldhouse ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: ; "Greg Oliver" Cc: Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:59 PM Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system .. > I upgraded world an hour or so ago and it upgraded perl to 5.8. It doesn't > appear on hold to me. So far, no ill effects. > > Tom Veldhouse > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Cummings" > To: "Greg Oliver" > Cc: > Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:04 PM > Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system .. > > > > It's actually been put back on hold until we can resolve a problem with > > the libperl.so (namely that it is always called libperl.so no matter > > what version it refers to). If that is fixed appropriately - hopefully > > no remerging will be necessary. If you go with the masked build, > > emerging will be necessary, which is something we'd rather avoid. > > > > -Mike > > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 10:56:56PM -0600, Greg Oliver wrote: > > > Will it automatically rebuild all packages that are built against Perl > > > 5.6.1 libs when it emerges, or will I have to track them down with a > > > script and rebuild them manually? > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:35:42 -0500 > > > Michael Cummings wrote: > > > > > > > Henti, > > > > > > > > It's unmasked as of a few hours ago. Give it time to actually > > > > hit the mirrors. > > > > > > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:57:27 +0200 > > > > Henti Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:31:28 -0500 > > > > > Michael Cummings wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked > > > > > > on any platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are > > > > > > running this on a MIPS. > > > > > > > > > > > > Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike - the perl maintainer > > > > > > > > > > hmmmm ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had to add ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to et it working ... which is > > > > > not something I wanted to do .. > > > > > > > > > > Henti > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > -----o()o--------------------------------------------- > > > > | #gentoo-dev on irc.openprojects.net > > > > Gentoo Dev | #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net > > > > Perl Guy | > > > > | GnuPG Key ID: AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E > > > > -----o()o--------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > -- > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > > > > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list