From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from smtp.mailix.net (unknown [216.148.213.132]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D1420EC599 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 13:13:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from [12.252.60.170] (helo=Darkstar) by smtp.mailix.net with asmtp (Exim 4.01) id 16tvdF-0007kv-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2002 11:13:49 -0800 From: "Michael Odell" To: Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Gcc 3.0.4 installed system Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 12:13:41 -0700 Message-ID: <001e01c1dd9f$2a8bd430$0300a8c0@Darkstar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 In-reply-to: <20020406101237.U26184-100000@shell.phattydomain.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 99806503-0851-429c-ac3f-3f686863e7a4 X-Archives-Hash: 6aff65cd43c5e383b0e21fcab0958f75 Thanks Geert! gcc 3.x is also required for compiling GNUstep, which I had been hoping to try with Gentoo. You've made it possible :) Thanks, Michael Odell -----Original Message----- From: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org [mailto:gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org] On Behalf Of Joe Oppegaard Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 11:18 AM To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gcc 3.0.4 installed system On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Bart Verwilst wrote: > Hmm.. > > Great that gentoo is now gcc3.x compliant :o) > But what are the advantages of using gcc 3.x over gcc 2.95.x? > Isn't gcc 3.x slower than 2.95? One of the advantages of gcc 3.x is that it has special optimizations for Athlon processors. Other then that, I'm not too familiar with gcc 3.x. > > Thanks, great work! > > On Saturday 06 April 2002 14:01, Geert Bevin wrote: > || Hi all, > || > || I finally installed 1.0 from scratch and decided to try it out with gcc > || 3.0.4 instead of 2.95.3. Along the way I encountered some problems, but > || surprisingly little. I've fixed everything that needed fixing and sadly > || some packages are backwards incompatible. For that reason and for the > || ease of maintenance I've created a dedicated gcc 3 profile. > || > || So, for those that want to try this out, just link the default-1.0-gcc3 > || profile instead of default-1.0 to /etc/make.profile. Note that this will > || only work for installations from scratch and not for updates since > || applications that link against libstdc++ v2 require the libraries of gcc > || v2 and not gcc v3. > || > || There are still some packages that don't compile such as galeon and > || openjade, but these will be fixed in a matter of time since I need them > || ;-) Feel free to submit fixes too. > || > || Best regards, > || > || Geert Bevin > > -- > Bart Verwilst > Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team > Gent, Belgium > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev > -- -Joe Oppegaard http://joppegaard.com _______________________________________________ gentoo-dev mailing list gentoo-dev@gentoo.org http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev