public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Todd Wright" <wylie@geekasylum.org>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Cc: "'Phil Richards'" <news@derived-software.ltd.uk>
Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Portage Integrity (Was: gcc ebuild's, downgrades, deletion etc)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:47:05 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000101c2e9c3$3d090110$fc911ecb@geekasylum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030311084337.1BFE08C617@derisoft.derived-software.demon.co.uk>

Phil Richards Wrote:

> My system is now trying to downgrade me to 3.2.2-r1 even though
> I use --upgrade-only, and I'm guessing that the reason why is that
> not only is 3.2.2-r3 onwards masked, but 3.2.2-r4.ebuild has been
> deleted.  And, in fact, all reference to it in ChangeLog has gone.
> 
> *Please* *please* *please* don't do this.
> 

I have to second this.  I recently submitted an ebuild (app-emulation/hercules-2.17.1.ebuild) and the developer apparently decided to copy the 2.15 ebuild to 2.17.1 rather than use the attached 2.17.1 ebuild provided.

Granted there were only minor changes in the new ebuild, but another more complex package may have seen more complex changes in the ebuild between the different versions, and added functionality is missing. He didnt even respond to my questions added to the 'bug', just updated one of the fields so I know he saw it.

I have to voice my concern for the integrity of the portage tree. If packages are being deleted and others being thrown together from an old copy instead of the fresh one, things are bound to break.

*Please* *please* *please* don't do this.
 
-- _--_|\ --------- Todd Wright -- wylie@geekasylum.org --------
  /      \            ICQ: 9589981   YIM: mvs38j
  \_.--._*  <---   http://www.geekasylum.org/~wylie/
        v       Mobile: +61-403-796-001    Ph: +61-2-9699-1746
----------------------------------------------------------------




--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-14  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-11  8:43 [gentoo-dev] gcc ebuild's, downgrades, deletion etc Phil Richards
2003-03-14  0:47 ` Todd Wright [this message]
2003-03-14 12:27   ` [gentoo-dev] Portage Integrity (Was: gcc ebuild's, downgrades, deletion etc) Spider
2003-03-14 13:19     ` Alain Penders
2003-03-14 13:32       ` Spider
2003-03-14 23:12         ` Matt Tucker
2003-03-14 23:17           ` Jon Portnoy
2003-03-14 23:23             ` Jon Portnoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000101c2e9c3$3d090110$fc911ecb@geekasylum.org' \
    --to=wylie@geekasylum.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=news@derived-software.ltd.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox