From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN, DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mout03.kundenserver.de (mout03.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.218]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9638C18983 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 04:00:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from [195.20.224.209] (helo=mrvdom02.schlund.de) by mout03.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 16AptM-0008Qa-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 11:00:04 +0100 Received: from pd4b89e49.dip.t-dialin.net ([212.184.158.73] helo=server) by mrvdom02.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 16AptL-0004Zc-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 11:00:03 +0100 From: "Sebastian Werner" To: Subject: AW: AW: [gentoo-dev] USE database? Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 11:02:24 +0100 Message-ID: <000101c17be1$a0546cb0$6400a8c0@server> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <1007370808.593.0.camel@inspiron.theleaf.office> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: b61be979-dec2-4ac6-a803-cf797d810701 X-Archives-Hash: 3d5e9a42d71e641ec8eeab8797aafa29 GConf for example don't depend on so many libs. I think the only not system-lib is glib. But this lib is used also by env-update. So no big problem. Good, the rescue Problem I agree. But it is much faster. Really cool could it be to store all settings from /etc in binary files. But that is not your way and not very fsh-compatible - I know. But it could be a general idea. I don't like to have 100 files which don't follow the same style. This is not very user-friendly.=20 Some other idea is to use the sheme of ksyscoca (like KDE-2.2). It reads text files and builds a binary cache. Sebastian -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org [mailto:gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org] Im Auftrag von Geert Bevin Gesendet: Montag, 3. Dezember 2001 10:13 An: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Betreff: Re: AW: [gentoo-dev] USE database? Hi, the idea of a binary registry is not the path to follow imho. All system critical settings and files should depend on as little libraries as possible and be editable directly. This is very important in case of system rescue. Putting these settings inside a database of some sort really removes much of the needed flexibility and creates a magical black box called 'system configuration' that no-one really knows and that pretty soon can only be done through dedicate tools ... very bad. Geert. On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 08:41, Sebastian Werner wrote: > Hey, >=20 > I like your idea. I have the same problems with the many variables I > could set. Some other idea I think could be good is to store the data > with gconf or something else (a binary registry - like windows but > better). >=20 > Sebastian Werner --=20 Geert Bevin the Leaf sprl/bvba "Use what you need" Pierre Theunisstraat 1/47 http://www.theleaf.be 1030 Brussels gbevin@theleaf.be Tel & Fax +32 2 241 19 98 _______________________________________________ gentoo-dev mailing list gentoo-dev@gentoo.org http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev