From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48, DMARC_MISSING,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from c011-h005.c011.snv.cp.net ([209.228.34.218] helo=c011.snv.cp.net) by cvs.gentoo.org with smtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15dlVe-0001Q8-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2001 22:38:54 -0600 Received: (cpmta 10279 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2001 21:38:47 -0700 Received: from c1646985-a.greley1.co.home.com (HELO darkstar) (65.13.200.9) by smtp.namezero.com (209.228.34.218) with SMTP; 2 Sep 2001 21:38:47 -0700 X-Sent: 3 Sep 2001 04:38:47 GMT From: "Michael Odell" To: Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Install (from source) problems Message-ID: <000001c13431$b9b0d420$0300a8c0@greley1.co.home.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20010902194535.A2711@cvs.gentoo.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Sep 2 22:39:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 22:34:28 -0600 X-Archives-Salt: db79c7c3-b7fc-4cc5-9e5a-108373007243 X-Archives-Hash: d708bdd2d0f87e6d2b4c7f64a3107265 Thanks for checking - sorry for the trouble. -Michael -----Original Message----- From: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org [mailto:gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org]On Behalf Of Daniel Robbins Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 7:46 PM To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Install (from source) problems On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 02:45:28PM -0600, Michael Odell wrote: > As I continued, the MD5 sum for the gcc package (2.95.3) wasn't the same as > the one I got when I did an rsync - I tried downloading both 3 times just to > be sure. To simplify things a bit, though, I removed the digest file and it > appears to be compiling gcc now. Perhaps I'll get this up today after all > :) Hrm; I just downloaded gcc again from ftp.gnu.org and we *do* have a correct md5. So it's possible that your download was actually corrupted or aborted early. # md5sum gcc-2.95.3.tar.gz f3ad4f32c2296fad758ed051b5ac8e28 gcc-2.95.3.tar.gz # ls -l gcc-2.95.3.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12911721 Sep 2 18:21 gcc-2.95.3.tar.gz Best Regards, -- Daniel Robbins Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc. _______________________________________________ gentoo-dev mailing list gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev