From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QB87x-0004Ti-GB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:13:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA0EF1C03E; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FFA1C01F; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so2098712yxm.40 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:06:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Dw28WEpZBsNpoROPDqv7imKVH9VYdmexBRxXW6FswbM=; b=vQO8NAb1a+7NDDrMESCUNUryqzcduf8G4Mi4rDJzNpQDKuzu+t7SPPLBmCPGhq0TBZ TcMH53rjvZxSmN/mHDwS10Bk30njlGAppsOPGB69nlINceykWcIBk5gDjBoYNayfoboT C/HTzfyiga6eE+75L71D3k8psm+4+gQdmdur0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=KPdm7GI0FIMBwY+mMxXvoGO5DG5gg0J4vhWW9ukpQcxgKgJtQlbYfWFMdYTz8va4SI GJI2wxJdE5mHHGka4VXti80JUj+PUGGDA8vTa58+xNJYMoEr6rlsXH9USOZowHcdPLlP nl9VVffKFsni6pmOcL2HltQchnzC55VI4W0kY= Received: by 10.236.201.162 with SMTP id b22mr285381yho.429.1302969998689; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-183-49-63.tx.res.rr.com [76.183.49.63]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u50sm1674682yhn.50.2011.04.16.09.06.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:05:19 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:05:19 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo development Cc: gentoo-dev-announce@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev-announce] Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate Message-ID: <20110416160519.GA7881@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo development , gentoo-dev-announce@lists.gentoo.org References: <20110412145622.GA26275@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo development announcement list X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev-announce@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110412145622.GA26275@linux1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: a82860be2d4bfcd950c36633d25c2161 --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline ll, there was a regression in 0.8.1, so 0.8.2 is now the stable candidate. I propose thatsince the differences between 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 are very small, we should keep the news item date and stabilization date from my original announcement. - news item release on 5/1 - stabilization on 5/8. William --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2pvj8ACgkQblQW9DDEZThUlwCdEaD4JTKes7B+Kqv7Yw0Xc+jH 1nQAoLYpBKOGbTpfvfQznkSMzlqsZwqG =urzB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV--