From: Tiago Marques <tiagomnm@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-desktop@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: kde-4.6 stabilization (was: Re: [gentoo-desktop] Re: more kde-sunset upgrade notes)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:00:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim5CxYc8mLa=Ln=52QimYH=k139Vw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201104151846.03011.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2039 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>wrote:
>
> Hi Duncan,
>
> > According to a recent post on the dev list, the gentoo/kde project had
> > intended to try to stabilize kde 4.6.2, thus eliminating the hal
> > dependency for stable kde4, clearing the way for its removal from
> portage.
>
> ... and that's still the plan. Ever heard of the famous "30days"? :)
>
> > Meanwhile, 4.6.2 has actually been released. Of course this is now
> beyond
> > that post, so it's my evaluation from here. If 4.6.1 was a bit of a
> > regression, as from that post it evidently was, for me it was fine. NOT
> > SO 4.6.2! It has a couple nasty regressions that affect me personally,
> > with others affecting other folks, some of which are posting to the kde
> > user lists I follow -- WAY more than they did for the 4.6.1 upgrade.
> > Based both on posts to the kde lists and my own experience, 4.6.2 is
> > anything BUT a stable candidate!
>
> There were some initial problems with 4.6.2 but slowly it is shaping up
> now.
> Please file bugs (if there are not already) for your "nasty regressions"...
>
> The list of known issues [*] that is linked from my blog post also contains
> stuff that alone would not prevent stabilization (only regressions compared
> to
> 4.4 are even considered as stable blockers).
>
> However, you are correct with one thing. Upstream is making a big mess, and
> I'm already looking forward to curious new bug reports for 4.6.3...
>
> As for kde-3, I fear it is going to turn into a maintenance and security
> nightmare...
>
>
Ping me if you need anything KDE3 related, I'll try to do my best to get
kde-sunset up to par. I'm closely watching this mailing list for that fact.
Best regards,
Tiago
> Cheers,
> Andreas
>
>
> [*] https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=blocked&resolution=---
> &query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=anywords&value0-0-0=354033&list_id=87497
>
> --
>
> Andreas K. Huettel
> Gentoo Linux developer
> dilfridge@gentoo.org
> http://www.akhuettel.de/
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3015 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-15 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-14 19:20 [gentoo-desktop] more kde-sunset upgrade notes Brent Busby
2011-04-15 3:53 ` [gentoo-desktop] " Duncan
2011-04-15 16:45 ` kde-4.6 stabilization (was: Re: [gentoo-desktop] Re: more kde-sunset upgrade notes) Andreas K. Huettel
2011-04-15 17:00 ` Tiago Marques [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTim5CxYc8mLa=Ln=52QimYH=k139Vw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tiagomnm@gmail.com \
--cc=dilfridge@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-desktop@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox