From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-desktop+bounces-1759-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Pb2nM-0000so-1n
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 03:15:16 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 924AAE098E
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri,  7 Jan 2011 03:15:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4A6E08ED
	for <gentoo-desktop@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  7 Jan 2011 02:09:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so7116684vws.40
        for <gentoo-desktop@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 18:09:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=Bzj3CUnfegwIOXb5z6EHLMswwkwKv+J77Req8O7OqQU=;
        b=by68b8LEnuTdn3HHunc6SkE41E8L5A663NrwHV817MQLyoem2zpywMJXL24pZ7eYdQ
         W7513XSwHqds8bomKEEQFbuoH+ybFqoTrlOsUWnmGjOJw3RgIJyxI9w+qServwW3rUpM
         e9ukaN5RYCd1FtfPBfd8rWSMsmTL4qgFUl6DU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=wt0tp2v/Bq3cucmTTQI0uunhP3VZZfzISb79z8so29GMmNtwksiPMpvItwuTN0EikH
         E/J2rRUeXyB6dsTOpmrh4KnsvgASy3pXnQTNic2kzdxXgZp76jmj6Wo3PkPzKWj/OPq6
         M6qZQM1LcgDmx9BF/TpKofqYRvLmWvXUl9XJY=
Received: by 10.220.165.203 with SMTP id j11mr7057919vcy.137.1294366156314;
 Thu, 06 Jan 2011 18:09:16 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-desktop@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-desktop+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-desktop+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-desktop+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-desktop.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-desktop@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-desktop@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.187.74 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 18:08:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Tiago Marques <tiagomnm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 02:08:56 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinExH235EO7=FiGuNJrjbwAqU3SspqzKSCYBMrG@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-desktop] kscreensaver-3.5.10 needs kdm-3.5.10
To: gentoo-desktop@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485eafc8cf4da3e0499381aeb
X-Archives-Salt: 3802a0b2-9c9a-4606-9ab7-b4c9d865f580
X-Archives-Hash: 3d752d2bc577427b9c391be0b191f2e3

--001485eafc8cf4da3e0499381aeb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Without this dependency check, kscreensaver will show an error:

"Could not lock screen, greeter plugin not configured..."

Along these lines. After compiling kdm-3.5.10, kscreensaver no longer gives
an error. Is it more appropriate to send this to a bug?

Best regards,
Tiago

--001485eafc8cf4da3e0499381aeb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Without this dependency check, kscreensaver will show an error:<div><br></d=
iv><div>&quot;Could not lock screen, greeter plugin not configured...&quot;=
</div><div><br></div><div>Along these lines. After compiling kdm-3.5.10, ks=
creensaver no longer gives an error. Is it more appropriate to send this to=
 a bug?</div>

<div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Tiago</div>

--001485eafc8cf4da3e0499381aeb--