From: AllenJB <gentoo-lists@allenjb.me.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: gentoo-desktop@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-desktop] Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:06:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE582D0.7080405@allenjb.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910241542.17701.reavertm@gmail.com>
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Resulting from discussion during last Gentoo KDE team meeting taking place 22
> Oct 2009 at #gentoo-meetings (summary fill be available soon), having Gentoo
> GNOME team representative, it's been decided to go ahead with splitting
> desktop profile to DE-specific subprofiles, to avoid bloat and provide desktop
> specific separation which should result in desktop subprofiles being actually
> practical.
> It's been proposed to:
>
> - keep 'desktop' profile but strip it from any desktop specific features and
> settings, making it default recommended choice for anyone using non-KDE and
> non-GNOME desktop environment, yet avoiding USE flags bloat. Any other DE is
> free to join and create own DE-specific subprofile if needed.
>
> - create 'KDE' (or 'kde') and 'GNOME' (or 'gnome') subprofiles within
> 'desktop' profile and move any desktop specific things there. This should in
> theory allow us to not add 'recommended' IUSE defaults to desktop specific
> packages, but keep those settings in profile - making profile effectively 'out
> of the box' solution for those who need it.
>
> If you have any comments, suggestions, important notices regarding this
> change, please keep discussion in gentoo-desktop mailing list.
>
> Thanks
>
As a user and someone who provides support on IRC regularly, I think
extra profiles in this manner is unnecessary complexity. At a guestimate
there's going to be less than 10 USE flags difference between the profiles.
(New) users already find it confusing what the differences between
profiles are (the number of users I've seen using a "developer" profile
because they do some programming, for example*) and frankly I think
having these extra profiles will make some users think you can only have
one of kde or gnome.
Why are we talking about "out of the box" with a distro that doesn't
even come with a pre-compile kernel? Or X installed? Gentoo isn't an
"out of the box" distro. If disabling use flags is considered too
confusing for users, maybe the entire system needs to be revised.
* Why is the developer profile even shown on "eselect profile"? Wouldn't
it be better to keep "unsupported" profiles off this list. Surely Gentoo
devs can cope with setting their profile manually in favor of a little
sanity preservation for the rest of us?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-26 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-24 13:42 [gentoo-desktop] [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME Maciej Mrozowski
[not found] ` <4AE30863.1060007@gentoo.org>
2009-10-24 14:39 ` [gentoo-desktop] Re: [gentoo-dev] " Maciej Mrozowski
2009-10-24 17:30 ` [gentoo-desktop] " Dale
2009-10-26 11:06 ` AllenJB [this message]
[not found] ` <4AE6012C.6010307@gentoo.org>
2009-10-26 20:40 ` [gentoo-desktop] Re: [gentoo-dev] " Maciej Mrozowski
2009-10-26 21:16 ` Sebastian Beßler
2009-10-26 21:39 ` [gentoo-desktop] " Duncan
2010-01-22 16:15 ` [gentoo-desktop] " Ben de Groot
2010-02-25 22:44 ` Theo Chatzimichos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE582D0.7080405@allenjb.me.uk \
--to=gentoo-lists@allenjb.me.uk \
--cc=gentoo-desktop@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox