From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14246 invoked by uid 1002); 10 Oct 2003 09:26:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-desktop-research-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-desktop-research@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-desktop-research@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 6061 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2003 09:26:37 -0000 To: gentoo-desktop-research@gentoo.org References: <200310091121.05738.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200310092000.09203.pauldv@gentoo.org> <1065734966.3824.78.camel@rivendell> <200310100953.58999.pauldv@gentoo.org> From: dams@idm.fr Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:28:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200310100953.58999.pauldv@gentoo.org> (Paul de Vrieze's message of "Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:53:58 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [gentoo-desktop-research] One research problem we could research X-Archives-Salt: b9c53c4a-4657-4ff8-a28d-d3314d044839 X-Archives-Hash: da2340850616c149a2a148f3f815948b Paul de Vrieze said: > On Thursday 09 October 2003 23:29, foser wrote: >> >> Only fontconfig and freetype influence font rendering. And fontconfig >> probably plays the major role in seting things up. >> > Did you ever see how earlier versions of qt misrendered things? The 3.2 > version is the first one that probably can use fontconfig fonts without them > being available through the core protocol. In this respect pango/gtk/gnome > are much better. Are now qt and gnome/pango technically ok to use correctly fontconfig fonts? If yes, we can concentrate on this, because other technology qhould desappear in middle/long term. -- dams -- gentoo-desktop-research@gentoo.org mailing list