From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28803 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2004 20:01:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Jan 2004 20:01:31 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AjOXa-0005Zr-Uu for arch-gentoo-desktop-research@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:01:30 +0000 Received: (qmail 19845 invoked by uid 50004); 21 Jan 2004 20:01:29 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-desktop-research-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-desktop-research@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-desktop-research@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 31496 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2004 20:01:29 +0000 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-desktop-research@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1074715063.16229.12.camel@sephora> References: <200401200954.58818.pauldv@gentoo.org> <1074595204.13623.27.camel@rivendell> <1074619859.7576.6.camel@newton.tomek.ca> <1074715063.16229.12.camel@sephora> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-akrft5LWZKjL/N6Tx3X3" Message-Id: <1074715285.1873.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:01:25 -0500 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamxCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-38.7, required 5, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, IN_REP_TO, PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_XIMIAN) Subject: Re: [gentoo-desktop-research] Report of the desktop-research meeting. X-Archives-Salt: d267bf50-05e2-44a0-916c-9351ce61be61 X-Archives-Hash: 5f82c4c2d3473ec06997d5d3c034ebf1 --=-akrft5LWZKjL/N6Tx3X3 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 14:57, Seemant Kulleen wrote: > You know, I have an idea (which isn't mine originally -- the originator > was the ex-dev ska-fan about 18 months ago, and more recently others > have mentioned it to me). I think it would be nicer instead of focusing > on installer, but rather on the desktop experience. One way would be to > have config tools based on dams' libconf, and the other way would be to > have UTF-8 default. I think Spider should chime in on this. Since avenj was too lazy to subscribe =3DP : wasn't there some kind of potential performance hit there? i thought i was thinking someone thought part of the issue with RH's performance was utf8 default, but now i'm thinking i'm not sure Anybody know more about this? --=-akrft5LWZKjL/N6Tx3X3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBADtqUXVaO67S1rtsRAln+AKCw9X0eqwNtjA4gVcYuhdtXPDpNEwCgoLFf EGbUi/UXjvp5U2doHSi4mqA= =6PPi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-akrft5LWZKjL/N6Tx3X3--