From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NHKlK-0000o6-HS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:19:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18C45E081A; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40F0E081A for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9250966E16 for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:19:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.358 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.358 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.241, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SYUe814gWEXa for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.isohunt.com (b01.ext.isohunt.com [208.71.112.51]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9EC66FA7 for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22582 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2009 17:18:53 -0000 Received: from tsi-static.orbis-terrarum.net (HELO grubbs.orbis-terrarum.net) (76.10.188.108) by mail.isohunt.com (qpsmtpd/0.33-dev on beta01) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:18:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 7532 invoked by uid 10000); 6 Dec 2009 17:18:51 -0000 Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:18:51 +0000 From: "Robin H. Johnson" To: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for the meeting of December 7th, 2009 Message-ID: References: <7c612fc60912052340m49ec09b9u799a61192c11645b@mail.gmail.com> <19227.39421.169489.877878@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19227.39421.169489.877878@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 8a191af8-07c1-4b8d-a161-ef152b25e8e4 X-Archives-Hash: 81e7255b08a07d705e9e39c9104ce65c --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 12:48:13PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > > 4. GLEPs 58, 59, 60 and 61 (15 minutes) > > Read more about this as well as a nice summary at [3]. Vote for or > > against each of these 4 GLEPs. If voting against please suggest > > improvements and/or alternatives. > Shouldn't GLEP 57 be included in this list (although it's only > informational)? Yes, GLEP57 should be voted on as well. --=20 Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Robbat2 @ Orbis-Terrarum Networks - The text below is a digital signature. If it doesn't make any sense to you, ignore it. iEYEARECAAYFAksb53sACgkQPpIsIjIzwiwifACfQopqqs6KJik20QS2PUD43y55 rzoAn2bOoKT6Ho8VewKu4c79AL2UVWTe =yON5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--