From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCE1Y-0003xy-3L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:34:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DA61E03E9; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com (mail-fx0-f219.google.com [209.85.220.219]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77B7E03E9 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so725320fxm.34 for ; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 07:34:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3VTMwvsMrWahkmrV/kYTfu3HLHavxkaxBC/p3dwVv80=; b=Zjwoj6UiLDcuA1s58uj2oWNaols16azHYDhy+ShCykgPgUJTvLW6StNIarMvb9U2TR Cvu3qz5DXgCL+vxJ/WMz53DH7Xr4KL4BorU3QihGWyTyFmTxuYhMtYpBKkZvJGJtdTTu Vg+l9kclM51SNSaKQgehVgkqxSFT4udWhMgX4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Rypk9hwq3u9rCEcpi2CGlCG/tUN4rEDyyBqNbstLpWnROaJllsU7d8CYRq7du8b7aX o3d6wjbehgSpZ2/wObY1MjuoyovtzVfgFT2aZRjQ2aLVWB5Ay40L7rBanrcL1+GEuOfQ HFTB3fDWlLVxZSaSNc7tUf6m4i8o8e3BM8YdQ= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: p.jaroszynski@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.100.70 with SMTP id x6mr2061039bkn.140.1244126065156; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 07:34:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <200906031903.48673.vapier@gentoo.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Piotr_Jaroszy=C5=84ski?= Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:34:05 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 31cdf860b35a1ab3 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54: _live or _scm? To: Doug Goldstein Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 4ba2bf0c-c606-4489-89ff-6b1f44d85f2f X-Archives-Hash: f10acad308de11e1ef2a2ee17ec08e7c 2009/6/4 Doug Goldstein : > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Wednesday 03 June 2009 16:02:10 Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski wrote: >>> on/after the last council meeting the biggest problem with g54 seemed >>> to be whether to use scm or live suffix. I would like to do a small >>> poll here among council members so that I can edit the glep >>> accordingly. So, could you please state whether you prefer scm or >>> live? >> >> i prefer "scm", but "live" does make more sense like Ulrich points out >> -mike >> > > I agree with Mike here. I personally like "scm" better but Ulrich does > bring good points why "live" would be better. Are you voting for live then? > But honestly folks, this isn't a technical item. It's a frivolous > pretty item. If this is really the cause for some people's objections, > then you really do not belong on the council because you're not > dealing with TECHNICAL issues. I decided to ask the council because I can easily count votes here and assume it's a more-or-less accurate representation of the community and choose the more popular option. All this started with some devs asking me why scm was chosen instead of live and me wanting to avoid this GLEP being rejected/hated for such a trivial matter. --=20 Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski