* Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22
@ 2009-01-22 19:31 99% ` Petteri Räty
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Petteri Räty @ 2009-01-22 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Donnie Berkholz; +Cc: gentoo-council
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1036 bytes --]
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 18:23 Thu 22 Jan , Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
>> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> Discuss on-list before meeting
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>> - Council meta stuff (-council)
>>> - Can the size change? Minimum? Maximum?
>>> - Should we have 2-year staggered terms?
>> I'm in favor of a fixed size of council members, I'd like to see at
>> least 5 council members *if* developers want to change the size.
>
> What is your reasoning for this?
>
I would give the devs the possibility to restrict the council size if
they so want to do.
>
> Just as a point of reference, the council has voted to change GLEP 39 in
> the past. I definitely feel that we need to hold this discussion
> publicly and get input from everyone. I think the council should then
> take all this input into consideration and vote upon it.
>
I guess it depends on the scope of the changes. We can always vote
whether we want to hold a general vote on the issue :)
Regards,
Petteri
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
[not found] <20090121233526.GA15870@comet>
[not found] ` <20090122000229.GF15870@comet>
[not found] ` <1232644991.4164.19.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de>
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22 Donnie Berkholz
2009-01-22 19:31 99% ` Petteri Räty
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox