From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVnUu-0007Zz-AO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:50:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D82EFE06D6; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A3BE06D6; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3481867AF4; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:49:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.984 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.984 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.615, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pfiYKeZMVRoe; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f221.google.com (mail-bw0-f221.google.com [209.85.218.221]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477071B4006; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz21 with SMTP id 21so619207bwz.24 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:49:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uEfpH5UT4pPzOxiA9I0fID5l2Ju4ENl28VYi94XqpoE=; b=pyrdIGQb80qFqz1SUfxKdffTnUGOxZdibf6wJTgvAao0OyQ7D4qbVU//C2kaSsPbA9 0NMccf6yHM4KRJe0SkYt6FBKlWXxn1Ck6yYmtuU9gB47a60Avx//gB37LLktL1D8Y3sS chB6GL3QNqhQ7nIR2mG+ub0SRgDTvzN4ryr54= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; b=HvcCAiKesSr6/FO4g2VB1wuYAD7ctHHMXlRwUhNLPeggwV+JKebCsdDUDXCTLhUrGa PoGuiILWXniSItGV925eJJVgkzU8AuZuXE+N7MHWklFbg0M0fCRZY1KAUDCjglj8hKlG 3SeFUUJ2n/zCjGkYAcUYmUCzzhkxP6Up2KZxA= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.89.6 with SMTP id b6mr806038wef.100.1263566980623; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:49:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:49:40 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: eca4d8743ea59e60 Message-ID: <7c612fc61001150649i2a14e903ia51e00ea6ef0224f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [gentoo-council] Agenda for the council meeting of January 18th 2010 From: Denis Dupeyron To: gentoo-council Cc: gentoo-dev-announce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 6672c590-0cd3-49e9-8703-169786ae542e X-Archives-Hash: 4134a24b5a92a4684b8b393fd0013fb7 Here is the agenda for the council meeting of January 18th 2010. It's packed so I will advise everybody to be on time in order to minimize timing slippage. 1. Intro (5 minutes, including late arrivals) 1.1. Make sure somebody is logging 1.2. Roll call 1.3 Who wants to chair? 1.4. Last chance for remarks on the agenda 2. prefix status (5 minutes) What has been done since last meeting? What still needs to be done and ETA for that? 3. mtime preservation status (5 minutes) What has been done since last meeting? What still needs to be done and ETA for that? 4. Should we move xz unpacking from EAPI4 to EAPI3? (5 minutes) This should have made it to the agenda last month but didn't (blame Calchan). A PMS patch should be ready for the meeting. If so then please vote. 5. GLEP 57 (5 minutes) Please discuss briefly and vote on whether to approve this GLEP or not. 6. GLEP 58 (5 minutes) Please discuss briefly and vote on whether to approve this GLEP or not. 7. GLEP 59 (5 minutes) Please discuss briefly and vote on whether to approve this GLEP or not. 8. GLEP 60 (5 minutes) Please discuss briefly and vote on whether to approve this GLEP or not. 9. GLEP 61 (5 minutes) Please discuss briefly and vote on whether to approve this GLEP or not. 10. Do we want to merge the code maintained by Tomas Sachau for multiple ABIs into portage 2.2 or should it be kept in a separate repository for now? (10 minutes) Note that this is not about approving the project for inclusion in the main tree but merely letting Thomas and Zac more easily maintain this experimental code. Note also that the portage repository is being switched to git right now (bug 196025). 11. Conclusion (5 minutes) 11.1 Action list. Who does what and when? 11.2 Who takes care of the summary and log for this meeting? When? 11.3 Next meeting date/time. 11.4 Who will follow-up discussions and prepare the agenda for the next meeting? 12. Open floor (ad libitum) Topics: multilib, vdb timestamps, anything else.