From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTVH1-00008F-TD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:25:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B10BFE01F3; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f217.google.com (mail-ew0-f217.google.com [209.85.219.217]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D19E01F3 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy17 with SMTP id 17so3209926ewy.34 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:25:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VsfZz7RaIeQL8vmBRqvqeyeXDnQTzKS1FrbtRocU2ew=; b=Q8yQ4EV3Klky7Z43kvHL26Al7h7oTPdM+kKQ3A6Iu6ptt1cbJ37e/BfWdKiJcPTOO5 eYUo0uAsJrm8bthqrwi9ifdQAfwgkgXN0K8Q3KuAYHzB3lLXIunckLFm1Hq6fwIlxnjg 3aIGGxCFdFdi8hFIlSYMtdHnEFUG4Jhwp6j/M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=HnzicaS/Zl7Sr2qWuX4BF78guEB7mdk628xzWRlYrBhjsztCbMMEu5WLcbEAqQZcM5 Y3JEnheYBOdaQjoA3XB8Kc5aTiC2J+TrgcVI4WMegrB09UKfIOUdOR2KWaBKWgdPDii7 Cq+g2au/6ksYfkR1EnBkGh/o5vgSpUQ/GqlVU= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.30.5 with SMTP id j5mr141521wea.209.1248243953599; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:25:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1248228093.5941.4.camel@localhost> References: <4A655D48.6040903@gentoo.org> <4A65974A.1020001@gentoo.org> <1248228093.5941.4.camel@localhost> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:25:53 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 02b3b883edebf36b Message-ID: <7c612fc60907212325w3b45c039nbafba86818031425@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Nuking this mailing lists From: Denis Dupeyron To: gentoo-council Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 035cfa84-e64c-4725-85f3-269cd4fa40f0 X-Archives-Hash: dd11bf41c86d4a4d90dd9ad64841ae87 On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Ned Ludd wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:24 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: >> Petteri R=E4ty wrote: >> > What I propose: >> > 1. Use gentoo-dev for technical council related matters >> > 2. Use gentoo-project for non technical council related matters >> > 3. Use gentoo-dev-announce to start threads if deemed necessary but >> > moderators should be alert in order to not have too much of these >> > through -dev-announce. >> >> I'd keep the council ml, I agree that there is some overlap, but >> -project and -dev have a broader scope and much higher noise/signal rati= o. > > I tend to agree with this also. > > The -council mailing list is one I'd like to see used for it's official > matters. If not simply for logs and historical tracking. Although I think the gentoo-council mailing list makes sense, I don't really mind where we post our ideas and discuss them. As long as we agree and do discuss them. What I care a lot about is that we only have one list. Not everything will be purely technical or non-technical. Where do we draw the line? In case of ambiguous topic most will just post at random, others will tend to always post on the same list, and in the end we'll have to read 2 lists to make sure we catch all what would have interested us on only one of them. Not counting those who really don't care about the council and will complain about our gibberish. So why bother? So, whichever list it is I don't mind, but please make a decision because I have stuff to push there. Denis.