From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NHUZj-00089k-5T for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:47:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAB76E0792; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 03:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B6CE0792; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 03:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.22.10] (ip68-4-152-120.oc.oc.cox.net [68.4.152.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B0167947; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 03:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B1C7B15.7020105@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:48:37 -0800 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090907) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-council CC: gentoo-dev-announce Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for the meeting of December 7th, 2009 References: <7c612fc60912052340m49ec09b9u799a61192c11645b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7c612fc60912052340m49ec09b9u799a61192c11645b@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f0fc3d1d-3b78-42ad-bd97-3ac242a18664 X-Archives-Hash: 91a84039ec12801368d104e013619765 Denis Dupeyron wrote: > 2. EAPI3 status (10 minutes) > Can we have an ETA? Even a vague one would help. I guess about 3 months or so, but it's hard to say. See tracker bug here as usual: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273620. While we're on this topic, I think we may want to consider dropping the slot-operator dependencies that are currently in the EAPI 3 spec, in favor of a abi-slot-operator dependency [1] that is generically useful for many cases in which reverse dependencies need to be rebuilt [2]. [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192319#c10 [2] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_071fb09fd5459e52de70826404f1fdcd.xml -- Thanks, Zac