From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MyMrG-00078c-Ef for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:42:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CD31E081D; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (host.petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2454E081D for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.226] (qob2.kyla.fi [82.130.46.226]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F5FC295E9 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4AD6EE8A.2040902@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:42:34 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Date of next council meeting References: <19157.60956.807706.113326@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <7c612fc60910140910n405bd8fdna818136f0109c4e2@mail.gmail.com> <19157.64021.783358.246684@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4AD6244C.5020103@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4AD6244C.5020103@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE6DBABD3E977BDA0E6E2458F" X-Archives-Salt: dcbf65a6-98d7-4b7b-865c-3105f1ea1102 X-Archives-Hash: 39640349c8e8aa36f927250bac21c9b4 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE6DBABD3E977BDA0E6E2458F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Luca Barbato wrote: > Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Denis Dupeyron wrote: >>> Keeping the meeting times in sync with universal time doesn't make >>> much sense as we all have schedules that are tied to our local >>> times, most of them being in sync most of the time. >> So far, it was always bound to UTC. >> >> But I have no preference. So if the majority of council members >> prefers 19 UTC (starting with next meeting and until some time in >> March), then we can shift it. >=20 > Would be nice at least for me >=20 > lu >=20 Either one works for me so if 19UTC works better for some people, let's go with that. Regards, Petteri --------------enigE6DBABD3E977BDA0E6E2458F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrW7o0ACgkQcxLzpIGCsLSYTgCfX8AS4U5DHxl1g/6Ne40RYUgc ZTIAoJJhDvaBdaIxeAFsr6zfxnecyp5b =AOPF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE6DBABD3E977BDA0E6E2458F--