From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-council+bounces-600-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1MT8fg-0006Hn-OO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:17:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DC8AE02E6; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (petteriraty.eu [78.47.27.97]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F104DE02E6 for <gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.217] (qiz1.kyla.fi [82.130.46.217]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93A957B90059 for <gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4A655D48.6040903@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:16:40 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090720 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-council+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-council+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-council+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-council.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-council <gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org> Subject: [gentoo-council] Nuking this mailing lists X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 3489454d-d751-4477-8725-c48c09f21d9d X-Archives-Hash: e0dcb0d0bd0cd735eea02b9cef27ffac What we currently have now: 1. gentoo-dev: technical issues 2. gentoo-project: non technical cross project issues 3. gentoo-council: supposedly council related things Problems I see with this: 1. People are unsure where to post to and cross post to mailing lists in order to reach more devs. The right way here is a single mailing list and gentoo-dev-announce. 2. We have two relative low traffic mailing lists gentoo-project and gentoo-council. 3. If we truly use gentoo-council for all council related matters it splits cross project technical talk between gentoo-dev and gentoo-council= . 4. The original point in creating gentoo-project / gentoo-dev-announce was that people wouldn't have to receive discussion about technical items if they wanted to. So technical items should stay on gentoo-dev instead of floating elsewhere. 5. -council is probably not reaching as many developers as -dev so technical issues might not get input. Granted this point can be helped by using gentoo-dev-announce but then devs who only want to see the decisions would see the initial discussion too. 6. A user not familiar with our mailing list setup might not find -council to follow up important threads if they want to. What I propose: 1. Use gentoo-dev for technical council related matters 2. Use gentoo-project for non technical council related matters 3. Use gentoo-dev-announce to start threads if deemed necessary but moderators should be alert in order to not have too much of these through -dev-announce. Regards, Petteri