From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXheA-0005JL-ME for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:54:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F225E02A8; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CDBE02A8 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (unknown [151.57.3.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDA6678D5; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <49947E88.9030405@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:54:48 +0100 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081205) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alistair Bush , gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009 References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <1234450419.20950.2.camel@localhost> <20090212160045.GB3642@comet> <20090212161644.GD3642@comet> <20090212162103.256b003f@snowcone> <20090212171055.GA3652@comet> <20090212172109.778fb268@snowcone> <20090212173743.GD3652@comet> <20090212180350.0d9a9df5@snowcone> <499471FC.7030007@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <499471FC.7030007@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 27c7b8e3-aae3-4b9a-86dc-331dc4187fb9 X-Archives-Hash: 6b1091d824066bf27ed38da65ca54fbf Alistair Bush wrote: > > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> I'm seeing a lot of people shooting down suggestions, and not many >>> people presenting good, workable solutions. Could we get some more of >>> those on the table? >> GLEP 55 *is* the good, workable solution. There still haven't been >> legitimate any technical objections to it. >> > > Stick the eapi in metadata.xml may be another solution. But I think > GLEP 55 is the proper solution. http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero/glep/migrationpath.rst Other solutions. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo Council Member Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero