From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>
To: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:31:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4978C99A.6030107@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090122173755.GC20446@comet>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1036 bytes --]
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 18:23 Thu 22 Jan , Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
>> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> Discuss on-list before meeting
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>> - Council meta stuff (-council)
>>> - Can the size change? Minimum? Maximum?
>>> - Should we have 2-year staggered terms?
>> I'm in favor of a fixed size of council members, I'd like to see at
>> least 5 council members *if* developers want to change the size.
>
> What is your reasoning for this?
>
I would give the devs the possibility to restrict the council size if
they so want to do.
>
> Just as a point of reference, the council has voted to change GLEP 39 in
> the past. I definitely feel that we need to hold this discussion
> publicly and get input from everyone. I think the council should then
> take all this input into consideration and vote upon it.
>
I guess it depends on the scope of the changes. We can always vote
whether we want to hold a general vote on the issue :)
Regards,
Petteri
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-22 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090121233526.GA15870@comet>
[not found] ` <20090122000229.GF15870@comet>
[not found] ` <1232644991.4164.19.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de>
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22 Donnie Berkholz
2009-01-22 17:57 ` Tobias Scherbaum
2009-02-12 7:01 ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-01-22 19:31 ` Petteri Räty [this message]
2009-01-23 12:42 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4978C99A.6030107@gentoo.org \
--to=betelgeuse@gentoo.org \
--cc=dberkholz@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox