From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KIx9o-0005UR-6Q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:54:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B863E04C2; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52076E04C2 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.10.50] (dsl081-070-030.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.70.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C072666443; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:54:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <487D62D8.7070700@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:54:16 -0700 From: Mike Doty User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080707) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chrissy Fullam CC: 'gentoo-council' Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement References: <20080714063554.GB5982@comet> <2c6d01c8e6ed$2d1dbb60$87593220$@org> In-Reply-To: <2c6d01c8e6ed$2d1dbb60$87593220$@org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b9a26127-a880-48e0-ae6f-b448637e90e7 X-Archives-Hash: 981566a2447148cf295fcb9e36f6f3b8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chrissy Fullam wrote: |> Can people be entirely banned from Gentoo? | | By technical merit I'd not say that anything is entirely outside of | technical ability if one has that ability to circumvent the system. Doesn't | mean we should throw the towel in and just sit back to take abuse though. | |> - What would such a ban include? Some ideas -- the person could not: |> - Post to any gentoo mailing list; |> - Post to gentoo bugzilla; |> - Participate in #gentoo- IRC channels; |> - Contribute to gentoo (hence my corner case of a security fix) except |> perhaps through a proxy; | | Mailing list rights and bugzilla rights for that email address would be [snip] Not to pick on you musikc, but can we all stop using the term 'rights' please. Regarding anything the infrastructure team provides, the proper term is privilege. TIA - -- ======================================================= Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org Gentoo Infrastructure Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05 ======================================================= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAkh9YtAACgkQgGui5Bn0rgUR6AP/XQGPbymLZhZ53qmK8oU3SauG BI3OC7jQ1CMUr2HLUNvSYDO8q/PIu9PKO9/AjBA7EEEtRtmt2ic6lWAS/+JfcPsE TCYWs7kV+xpPmQRPziTR1Vz6lsV+3t+M6V/0Kl2UcWp2M/tvc+yLIHN+TfOiq4Xj oI8+r3Hu012kD1a/yOQ= =+kRN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list