From: Mike Doty <kingtaco@gentoo.org>
To: Chrissy Fullam <musikc@gentoo.org>
Cc: 'gentoo-council' <gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:54:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <487D62D8.7070700@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c6d01c8e6ed$2d1dbb60$87593220$@org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chrissy Fullam wrote:
|> Can people be entirely banned from Gentoo?
|
| By technical merit I'd not say that anything is entirely outside of
| technical ability if one has that ability to circumvent the system.
Doesn't
| mean we should throw the towel in and just sit back to take abuse though.
|
|> - What would such a ban include? Some ideas -- the person could not:
|> - Post to any gentoo mailing list;
|> - Post to gentoo bugzilla;
|> - Participate in #gentoo- IRC channels;
|> - Contribute to gentoo (hence my corner case of a security fix) except
|> perhaps through a proxy;
|
| Mailing list rights and bugzilla rights for that email address would be
[snip]
Not to pick on you musikc, but can we all stop using the term 'rights'
please. Regarding anything the infrastructure team provides, the proper
term is privilege.
TIA
- --
=======================================================
Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org
Gentoo Infrastructure
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead
GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05
=======================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iJwEAQECAAYFAkh9YtAACgkQgGui5Bn0rgUR6AP/XQGPbymLZhZ53qmK8oU3SauG
BI3OC7jQ1CMUr2HLUNvSYDO8q/PIu9PKO9/AjBA7EEEtRtmt2ic6lWAS/+JfcPsE
TCYWs7kV+xpPmQRPziTR1Vz6lsV+3t+M6V/0Kl2UcWp2M/tvc+yLIHN+TfOiq4Xj
oI8+r3Hu012kD1a/yOQ=
=+kRN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-16 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-14 6:35 [gentoo-council] Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement Donnie Berkholz
2008-07-14 8:23 ` Alec Warner
2008-07-14 14:48 ` Ferris McCormick
2008-07-14 18:23 ` Roy Bamford
2008-07-14 19:20 ` Tobias Scherbaum
2008-07-14 19:54 ` Ferris McCormick
2008-07-16 2:39 ` Chrissy Fullam
2008-07-16 2:54 ` Mike Doty [this message]
2008-07-16 3:07 ` Chrissy Fullam
2008-07-22 6:34 ` Mark Loeser
2008-07-22 12:26 ` Ferris McCormick
2008-07-22 13:33 ` Ferris McCormick
2008-07-22 14:21 ` Chrissy Fullam
2008-07-22 13:51 ` Chrissy Fullam
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-25 13:24 Ferris McCormick
2008-08-14 9:51 ` Donnie Berkholz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=487D62D8.7070700@gentoo.org \
--to=kingtaco@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=musikc@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox