public inbox for gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Doty <kingtaco@gentoo.org>
To: Chrissy Fullam <musikc@gentoo.org>
Cc: 'gentoo-council' <gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:54:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <487D62D8.7070700@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c6d01c8e6ed$2d1dbb60$87593220$@org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chrissy Fullam wrote:
|> Can people be entirely banned from Gentoo?
|
| By technical merit I'd not say that anything is entirely outside of
| technical ability if one has that ability to circumvent the system.
Doesn't
| mean we should throw the towel in and just sit back to take abuse though.
|
|> - What would such a ban include? Some ideas -- the person could not:
|>   - Post to any gentoo mailing list;
|>   - Post to gentoo bugzilla;
|>   - Participate in #gentoo- IRC channels;
|>   - Contribute to gentoo (hence my corner case of a security fix) except
|>     perhaps through a proxy;
|
| Mailing list rights and bugzilla rights for that email address would be
[snip]
Not to pick on you musikc, but can we all stop using the term 'rights'
please.  Regarding anything the infrastructure team provides, the proper
term is privilege.

TIA

- --
=======================================================
Mike Doty                      kingtaco -at- gentoo.org
Gentoo Infrastructure
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead
GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6  F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05
=======================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQECAAYFAkh9YtAACgkQgGui5Bn0rgUR6AP/XQGPbymLZhZ53qmK8oU3SauG
BI3OC7jQ1CMUr2HLUNvSYDO8q/PIu9PKO9/AjBA7EEEtRtmt2ic6lWAS/+JfcPsE
TCYWs7kV+xpPmQRPziTR1Vz6lsV+3t+M6V/0Kl2UcWp2M/tvc+yLIHN+TfOiq4Xj
oI8+r3Hu012kD1a/yOQ=
=+kRN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-16  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-14  6:35 [gentoo-council] Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement Donnie Berkholz
2008-07-14  8:23 ` Alec Warner
2008-07-14 14:48   ` Ferris McCormick
2008-07-14 18:23 ` Roy Bamford
2008-07-14 19:20 ` Tobias Scherbaum
2008-07-14 19:54   ` Ferris McCormick
2008-07-16  2:39 ` Chrissy Fullam
2008-07-16  2:54   ` Mike Doty [this message]
2008-07-16  3:07     ` Chrissy Fullam
2008-07-22  6:34 ` Mark Loeser
2008-07-22 12:26   ` Ferris McCormick
2008-07-22 13:33   ` Ferris McCormick
2008-07-22 14:21     ` Chrissy Fullam
2008-07-22 13:51   ` Chrissy Fullam
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-25 13:24 Ferris McCormick
2008-08-14  9:51 ` Donnie Berkholz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=487D62D8.7070700@gentoo.org \
    --to=kingtaco@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=musikc@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox