From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K3brT-0004jG-HG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:07:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1949E04CE; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF18E04CE for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.209.1] (e176127251.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.176.127.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BADC64F92 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:07:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <48459680.1020408@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:07:44 +0200 From: Markus Ullmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080504 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gentoo Council ML Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Election voting period and type References: <4845954C.6070809@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4845954C.6070809@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2C96BE9E14541F97B66A55DF" X-Archives-Salt: 5a4d1cca-8c73-40ad-96b1-4e4b906039ec X-Archives-Hash: 9241e7e0498446fd27c296bd614408ce This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2C96BE9E14541F97B66A55DF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Petteri R=C3=A4ty schrieb: > Ok so we have the council majority saying we should have some kind of=20 > elections. I don't think a 1-week vote (option 2) makes a lot of sense = > any more as normal elections are closing any way. What we should decide= =20 > is if we go with the traditional 4 weeks nominating and 4 weeks voting = > or a shorter 2+2. I think we should go with the 2+2 to get back into=20 > working order faster and the time should be long enough for anyone=20 > actively working on Gentoo to notice. We already have people who have=20 > offered their services as election offices so if enough council members= =20 > put +1 here we can get the ball rolling immediately. >=20 > Regards, > Petteri >=20 As said, just get it going. I'm all for getting this done soonish. -Jokey --------------enig2C96BE9E14541F97B66A55DF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhFloMACgkQz974XjDVpblMXACeIkWtv8oB7v4RzwYan8qge9t9 1NoAoLPcCGjy6F6FSatQoPqCFBKwAjqp =AkLI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2C96BE9E14541F97B66A55DF-- -- gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list