public inbox for gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Vote: What next?
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:13:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48333F0E.7070609@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080520203151.GC9736@comet>

I'd like to have a feedback about what we did and how all the devs took 
our decisions. All we got lately was a minority quite happy but not so 
vocal and a smaller minority not happy at all but quite vocal.

So I see this issue as a good chance to know better in advance.

Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> To get some movement here, I'd like to get a concrete response from the 
> council in this thread for how we should proceed. Here's some options 
> that have been mentioned:
> 
>   1) Have an election now;

No problems with that route, having the election few month early won't 
change much.

>   2) Hold a 1-week vote asking all devs whether we should have elections;

This is quicker, less time consuming so I like it better, overall we add 
one week, so it is good only to get some more done before the normal 
election.

>   3) Say that last week's nonmeeting didn't count for any of these 
>      reasons: it was (a) poorly announced, (b) not voted on by a council 
>      majority or (c) not a regularly scheduled meeting; or

I'd like to have more feedback and avoid unnecessary clashes with people 
thinking otherwise, so not a good option.

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero

-- 
gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-20 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-20 20:31 [gentoo-council] Vote: What next? Donnie Berkholz
2008-05-20 21:01 ` Wernfried Haas
2008-05-20 21:01 ` Roy Bamford
2008-05-20 21:14   ` Donnie Berkholz
2008-05-20 21:58     ` Roy Bamford
2008-05-20 21:13 ` Luca Barbato [this message]
2008-05-20 21:50 ` Ferris McCormick
2008-05-20 22:29 ` Ned Ludd
2008-05-21 19:33 ` Petteri Räty
2008-05-22  3:13 ` Chrissy Fullam
2008-05-22  7:07   ` Alec Warner
2008-05-27  6:48 ` [gentoo-council] " Torsten Veller
2008-05-28  1:32   ` Alec Warner
2008-05-28  3:09     ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2008-05-28 18:46       ` Petteri Räty
2008-05-28 19:37         ` Alec Warner
2008-05-29  7:30         ` Wernfried Haas
2008-05-29  9:08           ` Markus Ullmann
2008-05-30 22:00 ` [gentoo-council] " Donnie Berkholz
2008-06-02  6:16   ` Wernfried Haas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-02  8:40 Markus Ullmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48333F0E.7070609@gentoo.org \
    --to=lu_zero@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox