From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KIxNE-0007w8-WB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:08:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FACBE0557; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.32]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CDFE0557 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id qRqY1Z00k0QuhwU53T8Bia; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:08:11 +0000 Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([24.6.98.17]) by OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id qT871Z0020NWACg3NT89YJ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:08:09 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=ni8Frk1T-iwA:10 a=MY_6DjmEkWsA:10 a=Da9HxLqKmnsawhL31SMA:9 a=wjLYbXJg2FhQrTCOTaALWzVRRXYA:4 a=MxZ3bB5I4kYA:10 Received: from localhost (localhost.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBD88B4003 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:08:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aUAitYKB29Rt for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco2 (orion.twi-31o2.org [192.168.0.11]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D9A8B4002 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:08:02 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chrissy Fullam" To: "'gentoo-council'" References: <20080714063554.GB5982@comet> <2c6d01c8e6ed$2d1dbb60$87593220$@org> <487D62D8.7070700@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <487D62D8.7070700@gentoo.org> Subject: RE: [gentoo-council] Extent of Code of Conduct enforcement Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:07:53 -0700 Message-ID: <2c8f01c8e6f1$29340140$7b9c03c0$@org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acjm70DfKK50SVZnR0awRedRjzB4kwAALV5A Content-Language: en-us X-Archives-Salt: 4da93167-55c2-453d-a0ea-7068cbad5886 X-Archives-Hash: c57d28b5608ccf34e993d4dde3fbb6b7 > | Mailing list rights and bugzilla rights for that email address would be > [snip] > Not to pick on you musikc, but can we all stop using the term 'rights' > please. Regarding anything the infrastructure team provides, the proper > term is privilege. rights rights rights rights rights rights rights rights rights rights rights rights Seriously, upon making requests from infrastructure I'll do my darnedest to try to remember your preferred wording and that your POV is that rights in this sense is not synonymous with privilege. However this email was to a larger crowd, not infra specific, and the subject of which is not correct wording but rather is regarding whether we should extend the CoC enforcement to include Gentoo wide bans. IT grammar police not required at this time but undoubtedly would prove invaluable if this suggestion were agreed upon and documents required revising, in which case you'd make an excellent editor and would have my vote! :) Kind regards, Christina Fullam Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | Gentoo Public Relations -- gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list