From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KIx2g-00046t-HU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:46:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5DCEE0534; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.40]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAFBE0534 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.44]) by QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id qR0u1Z00q0xGWP854Smx5H; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:46:57 +0000 Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([24.6.98.17]) by OMTA12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id qSmr1Z0060NWACg3YSmt9W; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:46:53 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=sqYqLFAhjWkA:10 a=-l4HkVeJ4JIA:10 a=fFDZcBjzcUJ4sWz-aQsA:9 a=5FxRb9qes3h7BlkB6Ix1ulR1iwAA:4 a=MxZ3bB5I4kYA:10 Received: from localhost (localhost.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB0C8B4003 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:46:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id czZlxr3M-0AA for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco2 (orion.twi-31o2.org [192.168.0.11]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239D38B4002 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chrissy Fullam" To: "'gentoo-council'" References: <20080710054946.GB8666@comet> <20080710055344.GC8666@comet> In-Reply-To: <20080710055344.GC8666@comet> Subject: RE: [gentoo-council] User Relations authority Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:46:37 -0700 Message-ID: <2c8601c8e6ee$30d0e2e0$9272a8a0$@org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcjiUVNtRhlkNuQzQTW0284PGO032wEnLn+g Content-Language: en-us X-Archives-Salt: f2fa1298-4579-4b2b-b4d6-601dd33e198d X-Archives-Hash: 79d8a528e1bf142a9e9dd9ac06471b6d > On 22:49 Wed 09 Jul , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Ferris asks: Does userrel have the authority to enforce the Code of > > Conduct on users in the same way devrel does for developers? > > > > Please respond with your thoughts. > > Here's my thoughts: yes. > > I'd also like if they came up with some sort of reporting mechanism (CC on > bug is good enough for me) to keep the council informed when action is > actually taken if we or the broader community aren't already aware of it. > Same goes for devrel, really. Absolute agreement here. Kind regards, Christina Fullam Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | Gentoo Public Relations -- gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list