On Sunday 13 December 2009 14:30:44 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:45:48 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > And the resolution for that was to make it possible to disable
> > > kdebuild-1.
> >
> > you were told multiple times that it doesnt belong in the master
> > branch and that it should be deleted.  if you actually wanted to
> > retain it, you could easily create a kdebuild-1 branch.
> 
> Uh. No. As per the Council's request, we turned off kdebuild-1 for the
> approved generated versions of the spec, and we made it possible to show
> kdebuild-1-specific things in a different colour.

i'm talking about when this crap was added originally, not any recent 
conversations

> > > That is not the same as deleting it while there are still
> > > users who have kdebuild-1 packages installed.
> >
> > the only people who have such packages installed were using an
> > unapproved spec with unofficial package managers.  as such, it is
> > their problem to continue to support the crap and  this argument is
> > bunk.
> 
> So you're telling users who did what the Gentoo KDE project told them
> to do that you don't care about them enough to handle the removal in a
> carefully controlled manner?

no one here said you had to change your PM.  i could care less about your PM. 
feel free to keep that crap in your PM forever ... it is after all your own 
fault.  nothing you said here is relevant to PMS in any way.

it's actually kind of sad how you can sit there and block any PMS additions 
that have been used in the tree for years because you didnt feel like 
implementing it in your PM, yet crap that was explicitly never official or in 
used in the tree you feel you have a right to keep in the PMS.  it doesnt 
belong there, it never has, so delete it/branch it already.
-mike