From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NJ9qU-00023l-56 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:04:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C10A8E0807 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f217.google.com (mail-fx0-f217.google.com [209.85.220.217]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5162E07EB; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so1200018fxm.10 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:18:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=BxG3U7wO3CHjFvAYPo4tKbHP4P3kzrDvzLzPQJHnHqw=; b=J6XyaP+TZ8fVMqRgYFh7yHyUHMzqPonWS0CeO0UhO6DM/BwFQMVtPFrYejW6s6oLar FotuPP7Rm8/wKWlV0dM5W2kRUo23F6Rbb5UYgvxc8Gq0zf6n92WInnsVgMcvuQAFcnIu BT9/4IofvoOvBIHljGk4jYWeZsFRMy5JJgad4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=siAgKbzv3J/GlcnNebCIJUgMVeAJ3o3RmaU5j2L5KSNfu/pCDAVGnZqCCfCcAu+Uls n8BGy5JWpqdEoE68L2DbFYqbpuvKwhYKQQEbY+ba/Jk1lF77fBePk86eht1RSGivgA4I oEpfbDv3x9/+v0MZgaoDvOSo2J0DlWLhKI1BA= Received: by 10.223.57.66 with SMTP id b2mr1813698fah.33.1260551932279; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:18:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowmobile (cpc1-sgyl18-0-0-cust846.sgyl.cable.virginmedia.com [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 19sm3157816fkr.48.2009.12.11.09.18.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:18:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:18:14 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: Brian Harring , gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-pms] kdebuild-1 conditionales Message-ID: <20091211171814.76d7e286@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <19234.32055.471891.86138@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20091210214848.7d070ab2@gentoo.org> <20091210222730.5df0df14@snowmobile> <20091211081754.GA6529@hrair> <20091211135750.1c24a3fd@snowmobile> <19234.23228.586356.915011@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20091211170245.053f6f16@snowmobile> <19234.32055.471891.86138@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.18.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/cvjgL9XVf=e0QWDWC/mpnUC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 57b0c623-c267-4c55-b847-0b02d65b6114 X-Archives-Hash: 10a1d0ab9cdbf53959fe77872aea8aa5 --Sig_/cvjgL9XVf=e0QWDWC/mpnUC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:11:19 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > [...] kdebuild-1 needs to remain so long as package managers > > support it. >=20 > We can considerably shorten this discussion, because it boils down to > the following: PMS is an official Gentoo document, and therefore it's > not upon you to make this decision. Alright. We'll escalate this to the Council then. Council: please vote on the following at the next meeting: "kdebuild-1 to be kept in PMS as-is until we're reasonably sure that no users have installed packages that use kdebuild-1. Since kdebuild-1 is no longer actively used for installable packages, when time permits, and to fit in with the normal release cycle, the Paludis team shall take steps to notify users who do have installed kdebuild-1 packages that they should uninstall those packages. This shall be done by having a deprecation check for at least one major version (x.y) series of releases before removal in the subsequent major version (x.z)." In the mean time, I'll give Christian a day or two to revert every patch he's applied recently that didn't follow the Council-mandated review process, or I can do the revert for him if he doesn't have time himself. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/cvjgL9XVf=e0QWDWC/mpnUC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksiftkACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGHfACdGbw1nbQZgE0szjf7Us0QVNnB sHMAmwZ6CS2+w+j65y6xvaegtrCKbpK0 =DgzK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/cvjgL9XVf=e0QWDWC/mpnUC--