From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MtMd9-0003sz-AZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:27:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D25AE07FA; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f222.google.com (mail-ew0-f222.google.com [209.85.219.222]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4011EE07E1 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so229697ewy.14 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:27:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=RoljYYRBISeb5nMEZ8gAZz/3CsMdva7/sQWmyHaQmpg=; b=VGrn+ftws6RD3HtwalS4tyRPD/QRHqIIKPpUJqjYFU5edXa8EGp9o59hMi+TqbR/83 ykDPcke9QC2Z6WWiHr0UkVojk3+z+c0LLyhJ/zDXDOS2sUdJ6HsDszRnkKsECWRJolOJ YtnzQVJZp6yv8zYG1jAfDE6Sf/TaZRU1int2w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=kPXA10V4MvNBTXWvL/b24WA3t7N3EC4U2ijb2cC7pqIe4RRxgOUXpH5Kb4qS/xuqB0 ndCTL3EgE0+zn2Facjad+KQrgs/24a1I4FlKSvU05D9lyta//cDnDwvlzHWzQYAVE8dj 2SR+RZFttMZGhRVH5mQzUd3vAumClLGNGPick= Received: by 10.211.173.17 with SMTP id a17mr1339671ebp.77.1254407257401; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowmobile (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm100836eyg.11.2009.10.01.07.27.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:27:10 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for October meeting Message-ID: <20091001152710.6ed617b4@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <19140.47881.499747.325046@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <4AC4B665.2000902@gentoo.org> <19140.47881.499747.325046@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/DoUxvHyoL=oeBfB/.0o=PqY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 131cfb05-70b8-47ce-9374-7a361ebb6fdc X-Archives-Hash: 9549996a2daa077ff901232dbd42a528 --Sig_/DoUxvHyoL=oeBfB/.0o=PqY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:22:01 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > EAPI 3 is reopened for the purpose of including one sole feature, > namely preservation of file modification times, as outlined in > bug 264130, option B of comment 26 [1]. Both Portage and Pkgcore > already comply with this, so it would be zero implementation cost. Why go with an inferior solution? Why not go with a solution that requires the package manager to fix broken mtimes? Also, what are the rules regarding this and things like stripping and other fixes and changes that the package manager performs upon files before merging them? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/DoUxvHyoL=oeBfB/.0o=PqY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkrEvEEACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHHqQCeKSsF1vRI5W4+fKD3QA7DuMLl KfIAn0rRYx3hoaupTJuLaau8Kl939YQi =qnGq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DoUxvHyoL=oeBfB/.0o=PqY--