From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for September 14th meeting
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 01:05:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090913010503.0ad46402@snowmobile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AAC352A.50008@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1004 bytes --]
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:56:26 +0000
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@gentoo.org> wrote:
> it isn't a "mistaken impression". Both Joshua and me think there are
> alternatives and that the choice to put profiles/* under EAPI was
> unfortunate and should be reviewed.
Why were those alternatives never expressed? Why were your objections
not raised at the time, and why have you never explained what you think
is wrong with it or what you think a better option would be?
> It's also my opinion that what the council approved was the use of a
> EAPI file under each profile to mark the type of atoms that can be
> used in the profile files (slots, etc).
What the council agreed upon is not a matter of opinion. The council
agreed to introduce EAPI control to profiles/. This was in no way
limited to "the types of atoms that can be used", and the wording and
design were very deliberately constructed *not* to limit the changes to
those kinds of things.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-13 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-12 12:14 [gentoo-council] Agenda for September 14th meeting Tobias Scherbaum
2009-09-12 15:08 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-12 23:56 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2009-09-13 0:05 ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2009-09-13 0:16 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2009-09-13 0:25 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2009-09-12 16:45 ` Andrew D Kirch
2009-09-12 18:16 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-12 21:49 ` Andrew D Kirch
2009-09-12 21:58 ` Ciaran McCreesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090913010503.0ad46402@snowmobile \
--to=ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com \
--cc=gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox