From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lh37n-0003mK-KA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:40:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9A5DE01F9; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.145]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8D5E01F9 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 9so1092607qwj.10 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:39:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=O34JomtPdgPykG/ixtyxCL7QuvzV0o2RlbKQ9DW8er0=; b=XMsq71HoemSMyLMT9QQHDffVb2Fc2isbNPgPEUNWs+2E8cu112D9hs+NiHvEetf6IH F4yPeEX+BeK+nIP5/k3Qs7pMafsRU1xy/Jomkel1Z2XS/dJqH+/pVKfYU+9YzZdnDkfD SMiFgoaRuo2cwfSGkn45OF4VWw16NLxPxOC2k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Pjs4qAMqntjTVaxqnKcAXZch0E+cq7LZRUL7mT2WE+2PSQCshm3m+Fvva1lOxu1g7j xNeXEj4KGnBi+f8rTtDMIC2wwstEkREzsNbHea66PwKJCympGVH4R6Wp5acc1CvDJUuX Yk+vL/iAqncnHhp7l3Qhpexln8ojwDheHh4E0= Received: by 10.220.98.209 with SMTP id r17mr2365115vcn.20.1236695986830; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.gmail.com (c-69-249-154-72.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [69.249.154.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm5166689yxk.42.2009.03.10.07.39.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Thomas Anderson Received: by smtp.gmail.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) gentoofan23@gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:39:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:39:45 -0400 From: Thomas Anderson To: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal Message-ID: <20090310143945.GA8976@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net> References: <20090309224725.GA11724@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net> <49B5CFDF.3050006@gentoo.org> <20090310140003.GA29607@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090310140003.GA29607@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 748d0591-12c5-48ea-9cb1-882b28e78b22 X-Archives-Hash: 45d9f0e3252488c9a7fb74abb7f46800 On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:00:03AM -0400, Thomas Anderson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:26:39AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: > > Thomas Anderson wrote: > That's not a technical objection in my opinion. That's an objection that > the doc doesn't go far enough, to which the answer is that it's the > first step. Just because the first step doesn't go as far as some would > like isn't a reason to take the first step. Make that "isn't a reason not to take the first step". *sigh* -- --------- Thomas Anderson Gentoo Developer ///////// Areas of responsibility: AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council ---------