From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXe0T-0001dm-Il for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:01:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A61BE0110; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A859E0110 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (c-98-246-79-112.hsd1.or.comcast.net [98.246.79.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BA167690; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:01:14 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: Ciaran McCreesh Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009 Message-ID: <20090212160114.GC3642@comet> References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <20090210212518.GD3692@comet> <1234421593.20307.22.camel@localhost> <20090212155056.GA3642@comet> <20090212155506.3bf4c8f2@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090212155506.3bf4c8f2@snowcone> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: 2121b086-7797-4159-aad6-e0d44e8fb6ea X-Archives-Hash: 816fef92dbc912c987cc02d33c6a61fa --lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 15:55 Thu 12 Feb , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:50:56 -0800 > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > I agree that it's a great idea to assign someone responsibility for=20 > > following up, and I think that the person who brings up the topic is=20 > > best qualified and motivated to do so. I don't see any reason to > > require it to be a council member. >=20 > Unfortunately, things are often postponed because Council members > haven't done their homework or haven't looked at proposals until half > an hour before the meeting, not because there's more work required... Ciaran, What do you propose we do to change this? --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmUR8oACgkQXVaO67S1rturnQCeIAo7c+E6hxYRo9+2vDwa/wfU 0jQAnjAspQPd8EKRPRUB6qlZoWMV7BSS =+/tv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM--