public inbox for gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
To: Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:01:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090212070130.GA3764@comet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232647041.4164.33.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 889 bytes --]

On 18:57 Thu 22 Jan     , Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > I'm in favor of a fixed size of council members, I'd like to see at
> > > least 5 council members *if* developers want to change the size.
> > 
> > What is your reasoning for this?
> 
> To make sure different views are represented in council's decisions and
> to make sure the decisions are well-balanced. This can be partially
> accomplished with having, say, 3 council members, of course - but well,
> it's 5 to make sure. 

Listening to different views can also be accomplished by simply having 
an open discussion before making a decision. I don't think there is any 
requirement that these views are reflected in a decision, just that they 
are considered (and perhaps discarded).

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-12  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20090121233526.GA15870@comet>
     [not found] ` <20090122000229.GF15870@comet>
     [not found]   ` <1232644991.4164.19.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de>
2009-01-22 17:37     ` [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22 Donnie Berkholz
2009-01-22 17:57       ` Tobias Scherbaum
2009-02-12  7:01         ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2009-01-22 19:31       ` Petteri Räty
2009-01-23 12:42       ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090212070130.GA3764@comet \
    --to=dberkholz@gentoo.org \
    --cc=dertobi123@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox