From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
To: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Secretary & President
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:04:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090207010453.GE3493@comet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090206223757.4d6e9c2a@snowcone>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 993 bytes --]
On 22:37 Fri 06 Feb , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:33:44 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > Does returning to 4-hour meetings mean things will no longer keep on
> > > getting postponed for 'further discussion' that will never happen
> > > because the meeting ran one second over its allocated time?
> >
> > If they never happen, apparently the people desiring discussion don't
> > care enough to continue bringing it up on the list ...
>
> So you suggest that when the Council postpones something for further
> discussion, the Council does in fact not desire further discussion?
I am trying to say that in the generic sense, people who want something
to happen need to drive that change.
Perhaps it needs to be made clear when further discussion should be
initiated by the people who want the discussion to happen.
--
Thanks,
Donnie
Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-07 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-06 9:26 [gentoo-council] Secretary & President Tiziano Müller
2009-02-06 10:52 ` Petteri Räty
2009-02-06 22:12 ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-02-06 22:18 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-06 22:33 ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-02-06 22:37 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-07 1:04 ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2009-02-07 10:01 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-02-11 7:32 ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-02-06 22:17 ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-02-10 8:55 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-02-10 21:18 ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-02-07 10:20 ` Roy Bamford
2009-02-07 16:54 ` Thomas Anderson
2009-02-11 7:34 ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-02-12 16:20 ` Donnie Berkholz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090207010453.GE3493@comet \
--to=dberkholz@gentoo.org \
--cc=ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com \
--cc=gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox