From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LVZGd-0003qH-9X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:33:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F1F8E0418; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D868E0418 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB8764B47; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:33:44 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: Ciaran McCreesh Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Secretary & President Message-ID: <20090206223344.GD3493@comet> References: <1233912372.13212.23.camel@localhost> <20090206221229.GB3493@comet> <20090206221831.456ae68a@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3Pql8miugIZX0722" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090206221831.456ae68a@snowcone> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: df48ce6c-8d3f-4da0-aaec-76a19f63ef8d X-Archives-Hash: a0eeaa8c09a836a048f1e6da262768c7 --3Pql8miugIZX0722 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22:18 Fri 06 Feb , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:12:29 -0800 > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > I agree that splitting president and secretary into separate roles is > > a great idea. I feel strongly that rotating these positions often > > will result in both roles being ineffective, because it takes time to > > get even decent at either of them. Does anyone want to return to the > > 4-hour meetings we used to have? >=20 > Does returning to 4-hour meetings mean things will no longer keep on > getting postponed for 'further discussion' that will never happen > because the meeting ran one second over its allocated time? If they never happen, apparently the people desiring discussion don't=20 care enough to continue bringing it up on the list ... --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --3Pql8miugIZX0722 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmMusgACgkQXVaO67S1rtuvVACfch45+wWrB1RZcaCiAXuij57p AIgAn0NQ/fSNGJ46uicUuOTH/ZscFBLy =OhTH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3Pql8miugIZX0722--