From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LVZ25-0001is-7G for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:18:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A958AE02CA; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f19.google.com (mail-ew0-f19.google.com [209.85.219.19]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EFAE02CA for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy12 with SMTP id 12so322970ewy.10 for ; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:18:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=IR4PBJEijXL/fcjAk0GeoPVueeMxvewSlj4V8tom1RQ=; b=kwoGTe6A2K8BmzzeqyJX5/NJC6/GsLYorwhD+uNPFXfooZGARHs35ACJ4qK0TUf9+N TWCo1uf/gc26DJm18QoEdhfbHamDdqb6g/A3OCCNtwOwB5i0lThotW3VeUsddPYkzpg5 AbeCQUllzu6rTjIs26nCjXF7MmvmV6mFNKjMM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=pkbaWTMXcdAKLSZEkNwMrQ8pMfQqnZgd7XXP92Diy3mDkKPFxcBSzdPIRHzotH0YK4 /a945EU19rlFdfhg+5ZTejUGMK4DANv33pCU+rrePMEGwuEqHCb33pZXzBebexBIJZ9c l9DkLqZsOPdRjaTaJpX+eO4OmZ9I9PkeKwu5g= Received: by 10.210.88.7 with SMTP id l7mr1681082ebb.3.1233958722561; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:18:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm651121eya.56.2009.02.06.14.18.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:18:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:18:31 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Secretary & President Message-ID: <20090206221831.456ae68a@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20090206221229.GB3493@comet> References: <1233912372.13212.23.camel@localhost> <20090206221229.GB3493@comet> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/kmiwmNBGjvkTL7/3UFUOwv5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 76842630-144d-4c8c-9080-86a48a68bf0f X-Archives-Hash: 3504763d706cbf0dc7ae7af92824b0cf --Sig_/kmiwmNBGjvkTL7/3UFUOwv5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:12:29 -0800 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > I agree that splitting president and secretary into separate roles is > a great idea. I feel strongly that rotating these positions often > will result in both roles being ineffective, because it takes time to > get even decent at either of them. Does anyone want to return to the > 4-hour meetings we used to have? Does returning to 4-hour meetings mean things will no longer keep on getting postponed for 'further discussion' that will never happen because the meeting ran one second over its allocated time? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/kmiwmNBGjvkTL7/3UFUOwv5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmMtzsACgkQ96zL6DUtXhECagCdGGYMBXa6xqY4aZbm28Gf5wZb dpwAnRnQZ+2lEypskRGqqlR6lif4x0Bu =e/B7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/kmiwmNBGjvkTL7/3UFUOwv5--