On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:12:29 -0800 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > I agree that splitting president and secretary into separate roles is > a great idea. I feel strongly that rotating these positions often > will result in both roles being ineffective, because it takes time to > get even decent at either of them. Does anyone want to return to the > 4-hour meetings we used to have? Does returning to 4-hour meetings mean things will no longer keep on getting postponed for 'further discussion' that will never happen because the meeting ran one second over its allocated time? -- Ciaran McCreesh