From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LPneu-0006pF-7w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:43:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C0D4E0701; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63232E0701 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anaconda.krait.us (unknown [74.93.222.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8A4642FA; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:42:46 +0000 From: Ferris McCormick To: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Voting procedure Message-ID: <20090122004246.301b348f@anaconda.krait.us> In-Reply-To: <20090121234527.GC15870@comet> References: <1231419666.7249.0.camel@localhost> <20090121234527.GC15870@comet> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.6.1 (GTK+ 2.12.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/.C7H6Z5qI9cUxJmSRt2M2aT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: a977d0eb-4c9a-496e-9b20-c57a56a26cd1 X-Archives-Hash: 45db6b1c15ebece5f58ba79bb54c6598 --Sig_/.C7H6Z5qI9cUxJmSRt2M2aT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:45:27 -0800 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 14:01 Thu 08 Jan , Tiziano M=FCller wrote: > > So far we've introduced the _reopen_nominations person in the last vote > > and it didn't change a lot. But there are more questions: > >=20 > > Does there always have to be 7 council members? >=20 > No. I think we should set 7 to be the maximum though -- big meetings get= =20 > unwieldy. >=20 > > If not, should there be a minimum? >=20 > No. Gentoo developers can decide how they want to be led. >=20 So, zero is OK and so no Council at all? Or one? > --=20 > Thanks, > Donnie >=20 > Donnie Berkholz > Developer, Gentoo Linux > Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com Regards, Ferris -- Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) --Sig_/.C7H6Z5qI9cUxJmSRt2M2aT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkl3wQ8ACgkQQa6M3+I///dwjwCfaqhVUu07rArzqNrH1mjgX6mm 038AoIu5ZFfqsRv5GBQsGFCSNiQVKJRZ =ZYK/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/.C7H6Z5qI9cUxJmSRt2M2aT--