On 15:19 Thu 20 Nov , Torsten Veller wrote: > * Donnie Berkholz : > > On 13:04 Sun 16 Nov , Torsten Veller wrote: > > > | * Whenever a member of the Council loses their position (the reason is > > > | irrelevant; they could be booted for slacking or they resign or ...), then > > > | the next person in line from the previous Council election is offered the > > > | position. If they decline, it is offered to the next person in line, and so > > > | forth. If they accept and the current Council unanimously accepts the new > > > | person, they get the position with a 'reduced' term such that the yearly > > > | elections still elect a full group. If the Council does not accept that > > > | person, then a new election is held to choose a new member. > > > > > > > > > So your options are: > > > - Change the rules once again. Because you can. > > > - Follow the rules. > > > > Try thinking about this from a different perspective: What is best for > > Gentoo? If the rules are broken, they should get fixed instead of > > blindly followed. > > That looks like a topic for today's council meeting, doesn't it? It sure does. Thanks for making that explicitly clear, Torsten! -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com