From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L2Buu-0004IA-6i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:45:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45105E038E; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB59E038E for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F0164CD4; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:45:53 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: Roy Bamford Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Stepping back from council duties Message-ID: <20081117214553.GD18019@comet> References: <1226946685.3232.0@spike> <1226957780.3232.5@spike> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1226957780.3232.5@spike> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: a7c76354-56e1-4dc8-bb5d-c8eec6cdb138 X-Archives-Hash: 17a687d6cb679a0caaa5289f1d2c88d4 --pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21:36 Mon 17 Nov , Roy Bamford wrote: > Its been pointed out to me that my phrase=20 >=20 > > While I'm reforming the council, .... >=20 > Could be interpreted as attempting to interfere in the affairs of the=20 > Gentoo coucil. I would like to clarify that it was intended as a throw=20 > away tongue in cheek remark and nothing else. >=20 > I would also like to clarify that I made my post as an individual=20 > developer and not on behalf of the Gentoo Foundation Inc. In response, I would like to ask the pointer-outer to calm down. Nobody=20 has any interest in attaching disclaimers like this to all their emails. It should be apparent that all devs speaks for themselves as Gentoo=20 developers unless specifically saying otherwise. If it's not, consider=20 it so now. --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkkh5hEACgkQXVaO67S1rtv1owCfTrdFWpCVmsGcRwCcMGPZU4ls F3QAoNmd/KKuazKUwJFVvVhl8G/ffmzc =aw+I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD--