From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JyYxy-00073I-Du for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 May 2008 21:01:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D5F1E0377; Tue, 20 May 2008 21:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at (mailrelay.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.2.202]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D220E0377 for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 21:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from basestar.localdomain ([84.119.62.192]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailrelay1.tugraz.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4KL1Yvp016633 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 23:01:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by basestar.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D8CA4FBAF; Tue, 20 May 2008 23:01:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:01:30 +0200 From: Wernfried Haas To: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Vote: What next? Message-ID: <20080520210130.GB26764@basestar> References: <20080520203151.GC9736@comet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080520203151.GC9736@comet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.002004 X-Spam-Score-relay: -0.3 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 129.27.10.18 X-Archives-Salt: 56cf86d5-1552-4e9a-845f-5f897165d5df X-Archives-Hash: 0116b194e48468686b477f9591ed19b0 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable First off, sorry for not taking more part in the public discussion on -project, i simply didn't get to read or even respond to it in the last few days. On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 01:31:51PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > 1) Have an election now; Would be the option of choice if people want to uphold the letter of glep 39 rather than the spirit, and also it would stall things for quite a while, so it's not the option i'd choose. However, if people want it, fine with me. > 2) Hold a 1-week vote asking all devs whether we should have elections; That's definitely my favourite option as it would be the most democratic approach and reflect whatever our folks really want us to do. > 3) Say that last week's nonmeeting didn't count for any of these=20 > reasons: it was (a) poorly announced, (b) not voted on by a council= =20 > majority or (c) not a regularly scheduled meeting; or Not really a good option i think. > 4) Something else. (What?) 1) Miss a meeting. 2) ? 3) Profit! :-) cheers, Wernfried --=20 Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org forum-mods (at) gentoo.org #gentoo-forums (freenode) --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIMzwqK/GNBBblp4ARAjH5AJ92mzRZmHpSrLOGmUlB1302j14ofQCeNkL9 oOLpM/WW3n70DBuf2E8Tjs8= =GuIk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp-- -- gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list