From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPlir-0002fh-Lx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:34:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0148EE04E6; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D118CE04E6 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245DE65D61; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:34:22 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: Roy Bamford Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] CoC: informal enforcement Message-ID: <20080214213422.GJ3768@comet.science.oregonstate.edu> References: <20080214200818.GH3768@comet.science.oregonstate.edu> <1203021957l.5905l.2l@spike> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1203021957l.5905l.2l@spike> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: a3ad0723-074a-48ab-a98a-b7aea2c9235f X-Archives-Hash: 1dc57ec034ed2b6a4cd81fee30071d46 On 20:45 Thu 14 Feb , Roy Bamford wrote: > On 2008.02.14 20:08, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > My hope is that with no team of people assigned to doing this stuff, > > we can actually build a culture and get more people participating > > rather than having "the people who do that stuff" and everyone else. > > The cynic in me sees the secret-proctors project taking shape. No intentions of making this secret.. > I have a great deal of empathy with the ideal. However, its better if > these 'stop being a dickhead' messages come privately from a respected > college than from a comparative stranger. > > Gentoo is big enough now so that many devs never work/speak with one > another, which is a part of the problem you are trying to address here. > > I don't think we need a group to do this - we already have one. The > developer pool, we need to raise awareness. It needs publicity to > encourage everyone to participate, something like a 'don't be a > dickhead day'. Yes, I agree that we need to encourage everyone to participate. I'm simply trying to jumpstart that process to encourage people by example. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list