Re: [gentoo-council] CoC enforcement proposal

[Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>]

On 16:42 Thu 08 Nov     , Wernfried Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 04:05:07AM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > All this team's actions must be approved by the lead within a short time 
> > period or must be reverted. It's expected that many actions will range 
> > from 6-12 hours, so 12 hours seems like a reasonable time to require 
> > lead approval. Whenever the lead is unavailable, approval falls to the 
> > council. (Remember, two council members together can make decisions.)
> 
> I like the spirit, but I'm not sure how feasible this is in practice.
> In any case, they should be documented (e.g. sent to some private list
> where the lead and council can see it).

I agree that it would be infeasible if this were a regular occurrence. 
My and Ferris's expectations were that it would be fairly rare, but we 
don't have much real-world data to bear that out. Could you share some 
from your experience with the original proctors?

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
gentoo-council@gentoo.org mailing list