From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NKGAJ-0000Vj-4X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:01:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DE71E09FD; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E11EE09FD for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.19.59] (hangover.linbsd.net [69.80.193.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6CC65677; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-pms] kdebuild-1 conditionales From: Ned Ludd To: Ciaran McCreesh Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20091211171814.76d7e286@snowmobile> References: <20091210214848.7d070ab2@gentoo.org> <20091210222730.5df0df14@snowmobile> <20091211081754.GA6529@hrair> <20091211135750.1c24a3fd@snowmobile> <19234.23228.586356.915011@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20091211170245.053f6f16@snowmobile> <19234.32055.471891.86138@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20091211171814.76d7e286@snowmobile> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:00:56 -0800 Message-Id: <1260817256.7072.7.camel@hangover> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 724aed80-3725-4381-a5ac-326f7bcb431f X-Archives-Hash: 0cdc39cd49196bd01db9b36821a47e20 On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 17:18 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:11:19 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > [...] kdebuild-1 needs to remain so long as package managers > > > support it. > > > > We can considerably shorten this discussion, because it boils down to > > the following: PMS is an official Gentoo document, and therefore it's > > not upon you to make this decision. > > Alright. We'll escalate this to the Council then. > > Council: please vote on the following at the next meeting: > > "kdebuild-1 to be kept in PMS as-is until we're reasonably sure that no > users have installed packages that use kdebuild-1. Since kdebuild-1 is > no longer actively used for installable packages, when time permits, and > to fit in with the normal release cycle, the Paludis team shall take > steps to notify users who do have installed kdebuild-1 packages that > they should uninstall those packages. This shall be done by having a > deprecation check for at least one major version (x.y) series of > releases before removal in the subsequent major version (x.z)." As pointed out many times to you. kdebuild has nothing with do with Gentoo proper. I see no reason that it should concern the council at all. I do not intend to vote on this item and consider the matter EOF. If you continue to mail bomb the council list, it will be considered abuse. -- Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux