From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXej9-00060T-GF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:47:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9A8FE044E; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.tmcs.ch (unknown [213.131.245.113]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED60E044E for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.168.149] (unknown [212.126.163.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.tmcs.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 601E81453BC4 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:47:49 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009 From: Tiziano =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= To: gentoo-council In-Reply-To: <20090212160114.GC3642@comet> References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <20090210212518.GD3692@comet> <1234421593.20307.22.camel@localhost> <20090212155056.GA3642@comet> <20090212155506.3bf4c8f2@snowcone> <20090212160114.GC3642@comet> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-e2+jKnhWReD1bJgQre+h" Organization: Gentoo Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:47:48 +0100 Message-Id: <1234457268.20950.7.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.4 X-Archives-Salt: 5c02faad-5814-4406-94ec-73051b674af9 X-Archives-Hash: 29c7a7734424ae53d67ff7796fe61814 --=-e2+jKnhWReD1bJgQre+h Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Donnerstag, den 12.02.2009, 08:01 -0800 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > On 15:55 Thu 12 Feb , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:50:56 -0800 > > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > I agree that it's a great idea to assign someone responsibility for=20 > > > following up, and I think that the person who brings up the topic is=20 > > > best qualified and motivated to do so. I don't see any reason to > > > require it to be a council member. > >=20 > > Unfortunately, things are often postponed because Council members > > haven't done their homework or haven't looked at proposals until half > > an hour before the meeting, not because there's more work required... >=20 > Ciaran, >=20 > What do you propose we do to change this? >=20 =46rom my past experience I can say that having someone responsible for a task within the leading group is a good way to have the whole team informed about what's going on. --=20 =EF=BB=BF------------------------------------------------------- Tiziano M=C3=BCller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin E-Mail : dev-zero@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30 --=-e2+jKnhWReD1bJgQre+h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmUUrQACgkQGwVqY66cHjB+KQCghDj72GA4KJ9FDCT7Xbcnamll PAgAniOHiStLr5CJAwZR8VjmEvVxQsa7 =yqOd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-e2+jKnhWReD1bJgQre+h--