From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L28EB-0006UW-TA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:49:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FEEAE01B9; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.libexec.de (omega.libexec.de [85.214.68.240]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CA0E01B9 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.libexec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C92A400E; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:45:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at libexec.de Received: from mail.libexec.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (omega.libexec.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bg3gYsC1ooyq; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:45:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.60] (dslb-088-076-149-240.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.76.149.240]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: tobias) by mail.libexec.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C3584002; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:45:24 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Stepping back from council duties From: Tobias Scherbaum To: Donnie Berkholz Cc: Ferris McCormick , gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo@fmccor.us In-Reply-To: <20081117161547.GA29951@comet> References: <491EF351.8040200@gentoo.org> <20081116060043.GD23210@comet> <20081116124154.TA6c518.tv@veller.net> <20081116175546.GH23210@comet> <20081116182110.6d1295ac@anaconda.krait.us> <1226860843.3922.61.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> <20081117161547.GA29951@comet> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-RASNYgD7CQi3lHuMRi0Y" Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:49:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1226944170.3939.12.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 X-Archives-Salt: ecf7eb89-fed8-4ef0-9156-cf0043cd2256 X-Archives-Hash: 9b02eb586c88917fcd3e7ebfc9108b7a --=-RASNYgD7CQi3lHuMRi0Y Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 19:40 Sun 16 Nov , Tobias Scherbaum wrote: > > Count me in as well for that idea. Having that "nobody" person running > > in the election allows us to have a clear and comprehensible breakup > > between those candidates who could easily fill a gap and those who don'= t > > (and therefore when it's time to hold an election for a person filling > > that gap). It still leaves one question open: What to do when "nobody" > > is elected on the 5th or 6th position (or even the 1st ...)? >=20 > Have a smaller council. The largest number of odd people <=3D7 that are=20 > ranked above "nobody". There's no reason it has to be 7, and it seems to=20 > me that on a 7-person council, about half end up doing mostly nothing=20 > that's related to being on the council. So we could end up with only 1 council member in the worst case? ;) I don't think that's something we really want. In my opinion we need to have at minimum 5 council members to make sure there's some kind of redundancy plus to get different views and ideas on issues brought up to the council. Tobias --=-RASNYgD7CQi3lHuMRi0Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkkhrqoACgkQX2bdwDDA8AVj/QCfYJrpyGbZu7mrVPzdyHIiAF2u W0UAoNxKlsPMnhaXxDrycxKmmEDzALbT =JEmI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-RASNYgD7CQi3lHuMRi0Y--