From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KaWMC-0005jR-9j for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:55:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1337AE076D; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 13:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.3.142]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC399E076D for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 13:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.3.120.141] (helo=spike) by smarthost03.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KaWMA-000890-Ny for gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:55:42 +0000 Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:55:34 +0100 From: Roy Bamford Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] RE: [gentoo-council] Foundation by laws: new Article V To: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <066c01c90cb6$8fa4e760$aeeeb620$@org> (from musikc@gentoo.org on Tue Sep 2 05:44:08 2008) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.3.25 Message-Id: <1220363741.3089.3@spike> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-Smarthost03-IP: [62.3.120.141] X-Archives-Salt: cbf6a332-b642-4480-8006-96503a4a8a67 X-Archives-Hash: b208945340e41cdd2a5b8a909bda8b38 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2008.09.02 05:44, Chrissy Fullam wrote: [snip] > ... I may not agree to it > and I > can accept that, but it is entirely within my right to ask for > clarification. [snip] >=20 > Kind regards, > Christina Fullam > Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | Gentoo Public Relations=20 Chrissy, You bring up an interesting point about 'rights' which since its likely to set a precedent I would like to respond to. The council is answerable to the entire developer community. The Foundation is answerable to its members. The two groups are not the same. You are a member of the former but not the latter, therefore have no rights with respect to the foundation. Having fixed the precedent about rights of non members, let the discussion continue. Its a valid point to discuss no matter who brings it up. The foundation wants to be open an listen to anyone who wants to make contributions. - --=20 Regards, Roy Bamford (NeddySeagoon) a member of gentoo-ops forum-mods treecleaners trustees -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAki9RdwACgkQTE4/y7nJvatebwCg/FZLcsPrJtLX64OpU21Sy3AS D4kAoO+26pT4Gdhl78LpXMfxHt+up5MI =3DGKNd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----