From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JyYy3-00073f-FX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 May 2008 21:01:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D57B4E037E; Tue, 20 May 2008 21:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost02.mail.mbr-roch.zen.net.uk [212.23.3.141]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0215E037E for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 21:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.3.120.141] (helo=spike) by smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JyYy2-0007fA-0L for gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 May 2008 21:01:54 +0000 Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 22:01:46 +0100 From: Roy Bamford Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Vote: What next? To: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20080520203151.GC9736@comet> (from dberkholz@gentoo.org on Tue May 20 21:31:51 2008) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.3.22 Message-Id: <1211317312.11979.1@spike> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-Smarthost02-IP: [62.3.120.141] X-Archives-Salt: eb694a8b-f893-4c3e-9428-17a34a0f1401 X-Archives-Hash: 33c4141957a62999f9aa1af4e46be71f -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2008.05.20 21:31, Donnie Berkholz wrote: [snip] > To get some movement here, I'd like to get a concrete response from > the council in this thread for how we should proceed. Here's some=20 > options that have been mentioned: >=20 > 1) Have an election now; After a week, I don't see how the council can do anything else. >=20 > 2) Hold a 1-week vote asking all devs whether we should have > elections; A vote about a vote seems like wasting time if you don't get the answer=20 you want. =20 > 3) Say that last week's nonmeeting didn't count for any of these=20 > reasons: it was (a) poorly announced, (b) not voted on by a > council=20 > majority or (c) not a regularly scheduled meeting; or Too late. >=20 > 4) Something else. (What?) >=20 > Which one do you prefer? Whatever you do you will upset someone. Its only 6 weeks until the=20 normal election process kicks off anyway, so may as well go for it=20 early and add 'fix GLEP 39' to your manifestos. >=20 > Thanks, > Donnie > --=20 > gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list >=20 =20 I hope you all stand again. Its the GLEP that's broken, not the council=20 but to gain a clear mandate to fix it, it looks like you have to go to=20 the electorate. - --=20 Regards, Roy Bamford (NeddySeagoon) a member of gentoo-ops forum-mods treecleaners trustees -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgzPEAACgkQTE4/y7nJvauhYwCePNPvZZuTbho17H7lE68FLsaj c0oAmwafhhiOGItXWa5p/aNLgq7LCHCL =3D19r9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org mailing list